what?
it's ok.
i know it is a little unclear, but it got you in here, didn't it?

So i agree with the newer findings of science that say that the smallest part of ALL molcules are quantum particles. So all of those particles all together would be a mathmatical object called a wave function. The word Aeon is the expansive devine everything. i use aeonic wave function to describe the collection of everyquantum particle in all of existance.

So if these particles make up even air electricity and light every cell in every living thing and all of the molecules of every nonliving thing, then they make up and move create and are everything.

This to my understanding is the concept of what is personified into forms like men or animals to be called some God or diety.

The fractal breakdown of multidieties religions so like that of our multiverses, universes, galaxies, worlds countries communities humans tissies muscles cells molecules and so on until you get to the smallest bit. which is the very same as all of it.


Are these religions the languages by which we understand the mathmatics that can perhaps define our and other worlds?

Any thoughts....?
posted by:
anami
Washington
  • Unsu...
     
    You might like Leibnitz's Monad Theory...Einstine did.

    A good presentation of it can be found in Copleston's History of Philosophy series.
    • So i did a liitle snooping about this historical philosophy peice about historical philosophy, the bit in question a blip about coincidental happenings. Which of course is a given in the enviromental structure i was referrring to, though the specifics of it are a bit offf subject. i can pull the same three to five cards out of a 78 card deckmany times in a row while shuffling REALLY well between. Which is impossible by normal standards of publicly concieved logic. i have seen this often so i go with the standards of logic based on these theories began centuries ago, but still being developed. Philoisophy is not a completed fied of knowledge and should be the least defined by history. Though in this case the knowledge has remained current, usually this is not entirely the case as evolution has never been seen to move backwards.

      So thank you for the soft drink flavor suggestion but what is for dinner?

      Do you have any thoughts on such concepts of science proving all religions as valid and invalid as anyother and backing that pantheistic view?

Recent topics in "Pantheism"